1.24.2005
Referring to US soldiers as "neocon killers" does not incline anyone to sympathize with your sentiments and is NOT cool. I read through the photo montage and articles, and to me, the soldiers were completely justified in their actions. Yes, they killed the parents, which is incredibly sad and unfortunate, but they had no way to know what was going on, and they had at most a couple of seconds to act. They tried waving and hand signals and warning shots before finally shooting at them. What do you expect them to do? What idiot drives like that with a car full of their own kids?
BTW, look at the relatively small expenditures for defense compared to social/welfare programs in your tax pies. Read about how the roman empire declined because it basically became a welfare state. Bread and circuses, it was known as. I think that the stupefaction, state-sponsored laziness and entitlement mentalitiy of our own citizens are as big or bigger threats than terrorism will ever be.
BTW, look at the relatively small expenditures for defense compared to social/welfare programs in your tax pies. Read about how the roman empire declined because it basically became a welfare state. Bread and circuses, it was known as. I think that the stupefaction, state-sponsored laziness and entitlement mentalitiy of our own citizens are as big or bigger threats than terrorism will ever be.
< 19:41 >< /j >
Comments:
yes. Killers. with a capital K. this is not indirect manslaughter. American soldiers pulled triggers that fired bullets that pierced the craniums of a mother and father in Iraq. Granted, these soldiers aren't confirmed neocons, however their civilian superiors (Bush, Rumsfeld etc) are indeed.
SO... in the name of accuracy...
KILLERS KILLERS KILLERS! (that take orders from hyper-powerful neocons/chickhawks ruling from washington that giggle as the American military converts innocent Mid-East civilians into red mist).
JUSTIFIED? how exactly? I would argue (flawlessly) that there should be no American occupation force in the first place. I would also argue that the entire invasion was not only unconstitutional, counter-productive, and wasteful - but also ILLEGAL.
Please provide your justification.
Post a Comment
<< Home
< /
~ chad >
~ chad >yes. Killers. with a capital K. this is not indirect manslaughter. American soldiers pulled triggers that fired bullets that pierced the craniums of a mother and father in Iraq. Granted, these soldiers aren't confirmed neocons, however their civilian superiors (Bush, Rumsfeld etc) are indeed.
SO... in the name of accuracy...
KILLERS KILLERS KILLERS! (that take orders from hyper-powerful neocons/chickhawks ruling from washington that giggle as the American military converts innocent Mid-East civilians into red mist).
JUSTIFIED? how exactly? I would argue (flawlessly) that there should be no American occupation force in the first place. I would also argue that the entire invasion was not only unconstitutional, counter-productive, and wasteful - but also ILLEGAL.
Please provide your justification.
<< Home
